Os critérios especiais de pontuação MELD proporcionam uma enorme vantagem a pacientes listados para transplante de fígado no Brasil / Meld exception points provide an enourmous advantage for receiving a liver transplant in brazil

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Current policy for listing to liver transplant (LT) may place cirrhotic patients without MELD exception points (CIR) in a disadvantageous position if compared to patients enlisted with appealed MELD scores - patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or special conditions other than hepatocellular carcinoma (SPE). Transplant rates, delisting, and waitlist mortality of CIR, HCC, and SPE candidates were compared. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to counterweight the listing rate and speed of listing of HCC, SPE, and CIR patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study comparing the outcomes of patients enlisted for SPE to those of HCC and CIR. In several countries worldwide, SPE patients also receive appealed MELD scores in a similar way of HCC patients. METHODS: Two cohorts of patients listed for LT in a single institution were evaluated. The first cohort (C1, n=180) included all patients enlisted on August 1st, 2008, and all additional patients listed from this date until July 31st, 2009. The second cohort (C2, n=109) included all patients present on the LT list on October 1st, 2012, and all additional patients listed from this date until May 2014. RESULTS: In both cohorts, HCC patients had a higher chance of receiving a LT than CIR patients (C1HR =2.05, 95%CI=1.54-2.72, P<0.0001; C2HR =3.17, 95%CI =1.83-5.52, P<0.0001). For C1, 1-year waiting list mortality was 21.6% (30.0% for CIR vs 9.5% for HCC vs 7.1% for SPE) (P<0.001). For C2, 1-year waiting list mortality was 13.3% (25.7% for CIR, 8.3% for HCC, and 4.0% for SPE) (P<0.001). Post-transplant survival was similar among the three groups. CONCLUSION: Compared to CIR, SPE and HCC patients had lower wait list mortality. CIR patients had the highest waitlist mortality and the lowest odd of LT. Current LT allocation system does not allow equitable organ allocation.

RESUMO CONTEXTO: É possível que política atual de inclusão no transplante de fígado (LT) esteja colocando os pacientes cirróticos sem pontos de exceção MELD (CIR) em uma posição desvantajosa se comparados aos pacientes listados com escores de critério especial MELD - pacientes com carcinoma hepatocelular (HCC) ou outras condições especiais (SPE). As taxas de transplante, exclusão e mortalidade de lista de espera de candidatos com CIR, HCC e SPE foram comparadas. OBJETIVO: O objetivo deste estudo é comparar a taxa de listagem e também a velocidade de listagem de pacientes listados pelas três possíveis categorias de listagem no Brasil (HCC, SPE e CIR). Há muito poucos estudos prévios comparando os desfechos de pacientes listados por SPE ao desfecho de pacientes com HCC e também ao desfecho de pacientes não priorizados (CIR). Em muitos países, pacientes listados para transplante de fígado com SPE são priorizados para transplante em um modo similar ao que ocorre com pacientes com HCC. MÉTODOS: Foram avaliadas duas coortes de pacientes listados para LT em uma única instituição. A primeira coorte (C1, n=180) incluiu todos os pacientes listados em 1º de agosto de 2008 e todos os pacientes adicionais listados dessa data até 31 de julho de 2009. A segunda coorte (C2, n=109) incluiu todos os pacientes presentes na LT em 1º de outubro de 2012 e todos os pacientes listados dessa data até maio de 2014. RESULTADOS: Em ambas as coortes, os pacientes com CHC tiveram uma chance maior de receber uma LT do que os pacientes com CIR (C1HR =2,05, CI95% =1,54-2,72, P<0,0001; C2HR =3,17, CI95% =1,83-5,52, P<0,0001). Para C1, a mortalidade na lista de espera em um ano foi de 21,6% (30,0% para CIR vs 9,5% para HCC vs 7,1% para SPE) (P<0,001). Para C2, a mortalidade na lista de espera em um ano foi de 13,3% (25,7% para CIR, 8,3% para HCC e 4,0% para SPE) (P<0,001). A sobrevida pós-transplante foi semelhante entre os três grupos. CONCLUSÃO: Comparados aos pacientes CIR, os pacientes SPE e HCC, apresentaram menor mortalidade na lista de espera. Os pacientes com CIR tiveram a maior mortalidade na lista de espera e a menor probabilidade de LT. O atual sistema de alocação de LT não permite alocação equitativa de órgãos.

How are HCV-infected patients being identified in Brazil: a multicenter study

ABSTRACT Background: Hepatitis C is an important health problem. In Brazil, 1-2 million people are infected. Despite this expressive number, and the availability of very successful treatment, many patients remained undiagnosed mainly because of the asymptomatic nature of the infection. Objectives: To describe epidemiological characteristics of HCV-infected patients seen at referral centers in Brazil, the source of referral, and the time spanned to reach a reference center, in order to improve the identification of undiagnosed patients. Methods: Multicenter observational, cross-sectional study carried out in 15 centers of Brazil, between January/2016 and June/2017. Data of patients with a confirmed diagnosis (anti-HCV and HCV-RNA) were collected by interview using standard questionnaires and by review of charts. Results: Two thousand patients were included; 55.1% were male, mean age 58 ± 11 years. Only 14.9% had higher education and 84.2% received up to five monthly minimum Brazilian wages (approximately US$260.00/month). The time between diagnosis and beginning of follow-up was 22.9 months. The most common reasons for testing were check-up (33.2%) and blood donation (19%). General practitioners diagnosed most of the patients (30.1%). Fibrosis stage was mainly evaluated by liver biopsy (61.5%) and 31.3% of the patients were cirrhotic at diagnosis. Conclusions: This multicenter Brazilian study showed that the mean time to reach a referral center for treatment was almost two years. Primary care physicians diagnoses most hepatitis C cases in the country. Population campaigns and medical education should be encouraged to intensify screening of asymptomatic individuals, considering the efficiency of check-ups in identifying new patients.

Estimating basal energy expenditure in liver transplant recipients: the value of the harris-benedict equation / Importância da equação de harris-benedict na estimativa do metabolismo basal em pacientes transplantados de fígado

ABSTRACT Background: Reliable measurement of basal energy expenditure (BEE) in liver transplant (LT) recipients is necessary for adapting energy requirements, improving nutritional status and preventing weight gain. Indirect calorimetry (IC) is the gold standard for measuring BEE. However, BEE may be estimated through alternative methods, including electrical bioimpedance (BI), Harris-Benedict Equation (HBE), and Mifflin-St. Jeor Equation (MSJ) that carry easier applicability and lower cost. Aim: To determine which of the three alternative methods for BEE estimation (HBE, BI and MSJ) would provide most reliable BEE estimation in LT recipients. Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study including dyslipidemic LT recipients in follow-up at a 735-bed tertiary referral university hospital. Comparisons of BEE measured through IC to BEE estimated through each of the three alternative methods (HBE, BI and MSJ) were performed using Bland-Altman method and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. Results: Forty-five patients were included, aged 58±10 years. BEE measured using IC was 1664±319 kcal for males, and 1409±221 kcal for females. Average difference between BEE measured by IC (1534±300 kcal) and BI (1584±377 kcal) was +50 kcal (p=0.0384). Average difference between the BEE measured using IC (1534±300 kcal) and MSJ (1479.6±375 kcal) was -55 kcal (p=0.16). Average difference between BEE values measured by IC (1534±300 kcal) and HBE (1521±283 kcal) was -13 kcal (p=0.326). Difference between BEE estimated through IC and HBE was less than 100 kcal for 39 of all 43patients. Conclusions: Among the three alternative methods, HBE was the most reliable for estimating BEE in LT recipients.

RESUMO Racional: Estimativa confiável do metabolismo basal em pacientes transplantados de fígado é necessária para adaptar os requerimentos energéticos, melhorar o estado nutricional e prevenir ganho de peso. Calorimetria indireta (CI) é o padrão-ouro para a medição do metabolismo basal. No entanto, ele pode ser estimado utilizando-se métodos alternativos, incluindo a bioimpedância (BI), a Equação de Harris-Benedict (EHB), e também a Equação de Mifflin-St. Jeor (MSJ). Esses métodos alternativos possuem aplicabilidade mais fácil e custo inferior quando comparados à CI. Objetivo: Determinar qual dos três métodos alternativos para a estimativa do metabolismo basal (EHB, BI e MSJ) seria o mais confiável em pacientes transplantados de fígado. Métodos: Foi realizado estudo transversal prospectivo incluindo pacientes transplantados de fígado com dislipidemia, em acompanhamento ambulatorial. Comparações dos valores calculados de metabolismo basal via CI aos valores estimados por cada um dos três métodos alternativos (EHB, BI e MSJ) foram realizadas utilizando o de Bland-Altman e o teste de Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney. Resultados: Quarenta e cinco pacientes foram incluídos com idade 58±10 anos. O metabolismo basal medido via CI foi 1664±319 kcal para pacientes do gênero masculino, e 1409±221 kcal para o feminino. A diferença média entre a taxa de metabolismo basal aferida por CI (1534±300 kcal) e estimada por BI (1584±377 kcal) foi +50 kcal (p=0.0384). A diferença média entre a taxa de metabolismo basal aferida via CI (1534±300 kcal) e estimada por MSJ (1479.6±375 kcal) foi -55 kcal (p=0.16). A diferença média entre os valores de taxa de metabolismo basal medidos via CI (1534±300 kcal) e estimados por EHB (1521±283 kcal) foi -13 kcal (p=0.326). Além disso, a diferença entre a taxa de metabolismo basal estimada via CI e a aferida por EHB foi menor que 100 kcal para 39 de todos os 43 pacientes avaliados. Conclusões: A EHB foi o mais confiável dos três métodos de estimativa da taxa de metabolismo basal em pacientes transplantados de fígado em acompanhamento ambulatorial.

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatocellular carcinoma: Brazilian survey

OBJECTIVE: The majority of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma have been reported in individuals with cirrhosis due to chronic viral hepatitis and alcoholism, but recently, the prevalence has become increasingly related to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis around the world. The study aimed to evaluate the clinical and histophatological characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma in Brazilians' patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis at the present time. METHODS: Members of the Brazilian Society of Hepatology were invited to complete a survey regarding patients with hepatocellular carcinoma related to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Patients with a history of alcohol intake (>20 g/day) and other liver diseases were excluded. Hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis was performed by liver biopsy or imaging methods according to the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases’ 2011 guidelines. RESULTS: The survey included 110 patients with a diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease from nine hepatology units in six Brazilian states (Bahia, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná and Rio Grande do Sul). The mean age was 67±11 years old, and 65.5% were male. Obesity was observed in 52.7% of the cases; diabetes, in 73.6%; dyslipidemia, in 41.0%; arterial hypertension, in 60%; and metabolic syndrome, in 57.2%. Steatohepatitis without fibrosis was observed in 3.8% of cases; steatohepatitis with fibrosis (grades 1-3), in 27%; and cirrhosis, in 61.5%. Histological diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was performed in 47.2% of the patients, with hepatocellular carcinoma without cirrhosis accounting for 7.7%. In total, 58 patients with cirrhosis had their diagnosis by ultrasound confirmed by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Of these, 55% had 1 nodule; 17%, 2 nodules; and 28%, ≥3 nodules. CONCLUSIONS: Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is a relevant risk factor associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with and without cirrhosis in Brazil. In this survey, hepatocellular carcinoma was observed in elevated numbers of patients with steatohepatitis without cirrhosis.

NUTRITIONAL STATUS AND DIETARY INTAKE IN NON-CIRRHOTIC ADULT CHRONIC HEPATITIS C PATIENTS / Estado nutricional e ingestão dietética de adultos portadores de hepatite C crônica

BackgroundThe hepatitis C virus is one of the main causes of liver disease worldwide and may develop nutritional deficiencies.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to assess and compare different nutritional status methods of adult patients with chronic hepatitis C virus, and to describe inadequacies in dietary intake.MethodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with adult outpatients with hepatitis C virus at a Brazilian hospital. Nutritional assessment included the 24-hour dietary recall, anthropometry (body weight, height, body mass index, triceps skinfold, mid-upper arm circumference, mid-arm muscle circumference, mid-upper arm muscle area, adductor policis muscle), Subjective Global Assessment, Royal Free Hospital Global Assessment and handgrip strength.ResultsA total of 94 outpatients (ages 30 to 76 years), was included, 46 were men. The prevalence of malnutrition as measured by the different methods was 6.4% (body mass index); 60.6% (handgrip strength), and 53.2% (Royal Free Hospital Global Assessment). There was correlation between mid-upper arm circumference and mid-arm muscle circumference (r=0.821), mid-upper arm circumference and triceps skinfold (r=0.575) and mid-upper arm circumference and mid-upper arm muscle area (r=0.781). Energy and protein intakes were below recommended levels in 49 (52.1%) and 44 (46.8%) of patients, respectively. Inadequate calcium, potassium, zinc and vitamin C intakes occurred in 92.6%, 97.9%, 63.8% and 60.6% of patients. There was an association between dietary energy and protein intake with Royal Free Hospital Global Assessment (P<0.001) and a tendency for them to be associated with handgrip strength (P=0.076 and P=0.054).ConclusionMalnutrition is frequently in hepatitis C virus patients. They have high prevalence of inadequate energy, protein and micronutrients intake, even in the absence of cirrhosis.

ContextoO vírus da hepatite C é uma das principais causas de hepatopatia no mundo todo. Hepatopatas podem apresentar deficiências nutricionais e desnutrição, influenciando no seu prognóstico.ObjetivoO objetivo do estudo foi avaliar o estado nutricional de pacientes adultos portadores crônicos do vírus da hepatite C, comparar os métodos de avaliação nutricional e descrever a prevalência de inadequação de ingestão alimentar.MétodosFoi realizado um estudo transversal em adultos portadores do vírus da hepatite C não cirróticos e não transplantados em acompanhamento ambulatorial no Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre. A avaliação nutricional incluiu antropometria (peso, altura, índice de massa corporal, prega cutânea tricipital, circunferência do braço, circunferência muscular do braço, área muscular do braço e músculo adutor do polegar), Avaliação Subjetiva Global, Avaliação Subjetiva do Royal Free Hospital, dinamometria e Inquérito Recordatório de 24 horas.ResultadosDe 94 pacientes (idade: 30 a 76 anos), 46 eram homens. A prevalência de desnutrição foi de 6,4% (índice de massa corporal), 60,6% (dinamometria) e 53,2% (Avaliação Subjetiva do Royal Free Hospital). Houve correlação entre circunferência do braço e circunferência muscular do braço (r=0,821), circunferência do braço e prega cutânea tricipital (r=0,575), circunferência do braço e área muscular do braço (r=0,781). Ingestão energética abaixo do recomendado ocorreu em 49 (52,1%) indivíduos e baixa ingestão proteica em 44 (46,8%). Consumo inadequado de cálcio, potássio, zinco, vitamina C ocorreu em 92,6%, 97,9%, 63,8% e 60,6% da amostra, respectivamente e consumo excessivo de sódio ocorreu em 53,2%. Houve associação significativa entre o consumo de energia e proteína com o Avaliação Subjetiva do Royal Free Hospital (P<0,001) e uma tendência de associação com a dinamometria (P=0,076 e P=0,054).ConclusãoDesnutrição é frequente em portadores crônicos de hepatite C. Pacientes com vírus da hepatite C têm alta prevalência de ingestão energética e proteica inadequada.